What this review covers
This is a historical review of the earlier Orvis Battenkill click-and-pawl reel handled by the original author. The current Battenkill Click is an updated generation and is not presented as the tested reel.
Orvis Battenkill click-and-pawl review
The Battenkill reviewed here is the earlier click-and-pawl model. The original author liked its traditional appearance, simple mechanism, and light feel on shorter trout rods. Although a current reel uses the Battenkill Click name, its updated construction and specifications require a separate review.
Construction
The historical reel's machined frame felt sturdy and neatly finished. A narrow spool helped control line stacking, while the traditional arbor kept the profile compact. The dark finish and restrained engraving gave the reel a classic look, although scratches remained visible after ordinary use.
Its uncomplicated construction was part of the attraction. There were fewer controls to manage, and the spool-release latch made routine access straightforward. The design was especially well suited to anglers who value direct line control over a powerful external drag.
Click-and-pawl system
The reviewed Battenkill used a four-position click-and-pawl arrangement adjusted beneath the spool. Removing the spool to change resistance was less convenient than turning an external knob, but the mechanism was simple and predictable. While fighting a fish, the author could add pressure by palming the exposed spool rim.
This system was intended for light trout work rather than maximum stopping power. Its value came from reliability, low weight, and direct feedback. Those comments apply to the original review reel only.
Handling
The reel felt light on the rod, and the handle was comfortable during normal retrieves. Changing between left- and right-hand operation was uncomplicated. The standard arbor could retain more line memory than a large-arbor design, and backing capacity was not its strongest feature.
Strengths
- Simple, dependable mechanism
- Light feel on shorter trout rods
- Comfortable handle and easy spool access
- Classic, understated design
Limitations
- Spool removal required for drag adjustment
- Modest resistance compared with a disc drag
- Standard arbor can retain more line memory
- Finish shows scratches
Conclusion
The earlier Battenkill succeeded because it was simple, light, and engaging to fish. It suited anglers who were happy to palm the spool and did not need a powerful drag. That makes this a useful review of the historical reel, but not a verdict or purchase recommendation for the updated Battenkill Click sold today.
How much 20 lb backing did you get on the Battenkill II Clicker with 4wt WF line (90 ft)?
Hey David. Yes, absolutely you will easily get 90ft. We have more than double that on a lot of our reels. 20lb backing is surprisingly thin.
Hi what would be the ideal set up lines for the IV version in spey configuration
The correct description of this type of reel is ‘spring and pawl’… ‘click’ is the noise it makes.
I’ve used a Battenkill 1 for fishing small mountain trout streams in New Mexico and I have used the Battenkill II with 50 yards of backing on the Rio Grande, San Juan, the Chama for larger trout. Both work really well and in all my trout fishing, I don’t need the built in drag because the larges Browns and Rainbows I catch and release are in 20 to 25 inch range. Both the I and II are sturdy reels which I use on Wooly Buggers, Dry Flies and larger streamers or an occasional pike, I use the reels on three and four weight trout rods. These reels serve my purpose well